CHARLIE HEBDO ATTACKS: NOT SO MUCH A FALSE FLAG AS A FREE HAND

Your Doubt No. 2, “the missing frames” is shared by many.
I felt this on the first Atlas Monitor showing of this video and seeing the clip that evening on Swedish TV.

The Slog.

hebdo2netTHE SEVEN DEADLY DOUBTS THAT SHOULD LEAVE EVERY OBJECTIVE OBSERVER PUZZLED

I still think the morons who carried out the various Paris attacks were “genuine” terrorists (see Slogpost of last week) but that doesn’t stop one from amassing a body of evidence to suggest that the authorities both knew the attack was going to happen….and turned a blind eye when it did. Some of the facts pointing in that direction have been completely ignored by a Western press set that has adopted the usual robotic Stepford Wife unanimity from Day 1. In the light of what follows, it’s hard to see why they should be believed:

Doubt 1: The security cop who killed himself

The Charlie attack began around 11.30 am (CET) on 7 January 2015

Immediately, a specialist cop with relevant experience – HelricFredou – was assigned to the case. He had been an anti-terrorist Special Branch…

View original post 659 more words

This entry was posted in Corporate Media, Paris and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.